Head-to-Head Analysis

Farfalloni no. 88, authentic organic pasta vs Nacho Flavored Popped Potato Snack

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Top Pick
Package of Farfalloni no. 88, authentic organic pasta

Farfalloni no. 88, authentic organic pasta

Not Vegan
VS
Package of Nacho Flavored Popped Potato Snack

Nacho Flavored Popped Potato Snack

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
339 kcal
Energy
464 kcal
1.8g
Sugars
3.6g
1.8g
Fat
16.1g
10.7g
Protein
3.6g
0g
Salt
2g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Farfalloni no. 88, authentic organic pasta and Nacho Flavored Popped Potato Snack side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

For calorie-conscious consumers, Farfalloni no. 88, authentic organic pasta is the clear winner. With 125 fewer calories per 100g than its competitor, it allows for more volume while keeping your energy intake in check.

In terms of sugar control, Farfalloni no. 88, authentic organic pasta takes the lead with only 1.79g of sugar per 100g, whereas Nacho Flavored Popped Potato Snack contains 3.57g. Lower sugar content is often linked to better metabolic health.

Looking to build muscle? Farfalloni no. 88, authentic organic pasta offers a protein boost with 10.7g per 100g, outperforming Nacho Flavored Popped Potato Snack in this category.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Farfalloni no. 88, authentic organic pasta or Nacho Flavored Popped Potato Snack?

Farfalloni no. 88, authentic organic pasta appears to be the healthier option generally, as it has less sugar and fewer calories.

Is Farfalloni no. 88, authentic organic pasta vegan?

No, Farfalloni no. 88, authentic organic pasta is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Farfalloni no. 88, authentic organic pasta and Nacho Flavored Popped Potato Snack?

There is a difference of 125 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.