Head-to-Head Analysis

Feastables Chocolate Milk vs Organic Soy Unsweetened Original

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Package of Feastables Chocolate Milk

Feastables Chocolate Milk

Not Vegan
VS
Top Pick
Package of Organic Soy Unsweetened Original

Organic Soy Unsweetened Original

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
99 kcal
Energy
33.3 kcal
9.9g
Sugars
0.4g
3.9g
Fat
1.7g
5.6g
Protein
3.3g
0.2g
Salt
0.1g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Feastables Chocolate Milk and Organic Soy Unsweetened Original side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

Feastables Chocolate Milk is the more energy-dense option here, packing 66 more calories per 100g than Organic Soy Unsweetened Original. If you are looking for sustained energy or fueling a workout, this higher caloric density might be an advantage.

However, watch out for the sugar content. Feastables Chocolate Milk contains significantly more sugar (9.9g) compared to the milder Organic Soy Unsweetened Original (0.417g). If you are monitoring your insulin levels or trying to cut down on sweets, Organic Soy Unsweetened Original is undeniably the healthier pick.

Looking to build muscle? Feastables Chocolate Milk offers a protein boost with 5.56g per 100g, outperforming Organic Soy Unsweetened Original in this category.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Feastables Chocolate Milk or Organic Soy Unsweetened Original?

It depends on your goals. Feastables Chocolate Milk has 99 calories, while Organic Soy Unsweetened Original has 33.3 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Feastables Chocolate Milk vegan?

No, Feastables Chocolate Milk is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Feastables Chocolate Milk and Organic Soy Unsweetened Original?

There is a difference of 66 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.