Head-to-Head Analysis

Festively Shaped Pretzels vs Slime Licker Sour Rolling Liquid Candy

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Top Pick
Package of Festively Shaped Pretzels

Festively Shaped Pretzels

Not Vegan
VS
Package of Slime Licker Sour Rolling Liquid Candy

Slime Licker Sour Rolling Liquid Candy

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
400 kcal
Energy
333.3 kcal
3.3g
Sugars
46.7g
3.3g
Fat
0g
10g
Protein
0g
2.3g
Salt
0.3g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Festively Shaped Pretzels and Slime Licker Sour Rolling Liquid Candy side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

Festively Shaped Pretzels is the more energy-dense option here, packing 67 more calories per 100g than Slime Licker Sour Rolling Liquid Candy. If you are looking for sustained energy or fueling a workout, this higher caloric density might be an advantage.

In terms of sugar control, Festively Shaped Pretzels takes the lead with only 3.33g of sugar per 100g, whereas Slime Licker Sour Rolling Liquid Candy contains 46.666666666667g. Lower sugar content is often linked to better metabolic health.

Looking to build muscle? Festively Shaped Pretzels offers a protein boost with 10g per 100g, outperforming Slime Licker Sour Rolling Liquid Candy in this category.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Festively Shaped Pretzels or Slime Licker Sour Rolling Liquid Candy?

It depends on your goals. Festively Shaped Pretzels has 400 calories, while Slime Licker Sour Rolling Liquid Candy has 333.33333333333 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Festively Shaped Pretzels vegan?

No, Festively Shaped Pretzels is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Festively Shaped Pretzels and Slime Licker Sour Rolling Liquid Candy?

There is a difference of 67 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.