Head-to-Head Analysis

Fine Ground Sea Salt Almond Flour Crackers vs Fuji Apple Slices

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Top Pick
Package of Fine Ground Sea Salt Almond Flour Crackers

Fine Ground Sea Salt Almond Flour Crackers

Not Vegan
VS
Package of Fuji Apple Slices

Fuji Apple Slices

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
522 kcal
Energy
352.9 kcal
0g
Sugars
73.5g
26.1g
Fat
0g
8.7g
Protein
2.9g
1.5g
Salt
0g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Fine Ground Sea Salt Almond Flour Crackers and Fuji Apple Slices side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

Fine Ground Sea Salt Almond Flour Crackers is the more energy-dense option here, packing 169 more calories per 100g than Fuji Apple Slices. If you are looking for sustained energy or fueling a workout, this higher caloric density might be an advantage.

In terms of sugar control, Fine Ground Sea Salt Almond Flour Crackers takes the lead with only 0g of sugar per 100g, whereas Fuji Apple Slices contains 73.529411764706g. Lower sugar content is often linked to better metabolic health.

Looking to build muscle? Fine Ground Sea Salt Almond Flour Crackers offers a protein boost with 8.7g per 100g, outperforming Fuji Apple Slices in this category.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Fine Ground Sea Salt Almond Flour Crackers or Fuji Apple Slices?

It depends on your goals. Fine Ground Sea Salt Almond Flour Crackers has 522 calories, while Fuji Apple Slices has 352.94117647059 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Fine Ground Sea Salt Almond Flour Crackers vegan?

No, Fine Ground Sea Salt Almond Flour Crackers is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Fine Ground Sea Salt Almond Flour Crackers and Fuji Apple Slices?

There is a difference of 169 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.