Head-to-Head Analysis

Finely Shredded Lite Mexican Style Cheese Blend vs Low-Moisture Part-Skim Mozzarella Cheese

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Package of Finely Shredded Lite Mexican Style Cheese Blend

Finely Shredded Lite Mexican Style Cheese Blend

Not Vegan
VS
Top Pick
Package of Low-Moisture Part-Skim Mozzarella Cheese

Low-Moisture Part-Skim Mozzarella Cheese

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
286 kcal
Energy
208 kcal
0g
Sugars
0g
14.3g
Fat
10.4g
28.6g
Protein
25g
1.5g
Salt
1.8g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Finely Shredded Lite Mexican Style Cheese Blend and Low-Moisture Part-Skim Mozzarella Cheese side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

Finely Shredded Lite Mexican Style Cheese Blend is the more energy-dense option here, packing 78 more calories per 100g than Low-Moisture Part-Skim Mozzarella Cheese. If you are looking for sustained energy or fueling a workout, this higher caloric density might be an advantage.

Looking to build muscle? Finely Shredded Lite Mexican Style Cheese Blend offers a protein boost with 28.6g per 100g, outperforming Low-Moisture Part-Skim Mozzarella Cheese in this category.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Finely Shredded Lite Mexican Style Cheese Blend or Low-Moisture Part-Skim Mozzarella Cheese?

It depends on your goals. Finely Shredded Lite Mexican Style Cheese Blend has 286 calories, while Low-Moisture Part-Skim Mozzarella Cheese has 208 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Finely Shredded Lite Mexican Style Cheese Blend vegan?

No, Finely Shredded Lite Mexican Style Cheese Blend is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Finely Shredded Lite Mexican Style Cheese Blend and Low-Moisture Part-Skim Mozzarella Cheese?

There is a difference of 78 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.