Head-to-Head Analysis

Flavored corn tortilla chips vs Pringles Wavy Classic Salted

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Package of Flavored corn tortilla chips

Flavored corn tortilla chips

Not Vegan
VS
Top Pick
Package of Pringles Wavy Classic Salted

Pringles Wavy Classic Salted

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
536 kcal
Energy
529 kcal
3.6g
Sugars
0g
25g
Fat
31.7g
7.1g
Protein
3.5g
1.7g
Salt
1.7g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Flavored corn tortilla chips and Pringles Wavy Classic Salted side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

Flavored corn tortilla chips is the more energy-dense option here, packing 7 more calories per 100g than Pringles Wavy Classic Salted. If you are looking for sustained energy or fueling a workout, this higher caloric density might be an advantage.

However, watch out for the sugar content. Flavored corn tortilla chips contains significantly more sugar (3.57g) compared to the milder Pringles Wavy Classic Salted (0g). If you are monitoring your insulin levels or trying to cut down on sweets, Pringles Wavy Classic Salted is undeniably the healthier pick.

Looking to build muscle? Flavored corn tortilla chips offers a protein boost with 7.14g per 100g, outperforming Pringles Wavy Classic Salted in this category.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Flavored corn tortilla chips or Pringles Wavy Classic Salted?

It depends on your goals. Flavored corn tortilla chips has 536 calories, while Pringles Wavy Classic Salted has 529 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Flavored corn tortilla chips vegan?

No, Flavored corn tortilla chips is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Flavored corn tortilla chips and Pringles Wavy Classic Salted?

There is a difference of 7 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.