Head-to-Head Analysis

Flaxmilk Omega-3 + Protein Unsweetened vs Organic tri-bean blend dark red kidney beans, pinto beans & black beans, tri-bean blend

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Top Pick
Package of Flaxmilk Omega-3 + Protein Unsweetened

Flaxmilk Omega-3 + Protein Unsweetened

Not Vegan
VS
Package of Organic tri-bean blend dark red kidney beans, pinto beans & black beans, tri-bean blend

Organic tri-bean blend dark red kidney beans, pinto beans & black beans, tri-bean blend

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
20.8 kcal
Energy
84.6 kcal
0g
Sugars
0g
1g
Fat
0g
2.1g
Protein
5.4g
0.4g
Salt
0.3g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Flaxmilk Omega-3 + Protein Unsweetened and Organic tri-bean blend dark red kidney beans, pinto beans & black beans, tri-bean blend side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

For calorie-conscious consumers, Flaxmilk Omega-3 + Protein Unsweetened is the clear winner. With 64 fewer calories per 100g than its competitor, it allows for more volume while keeping your energy intake in check.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Flaxmilk Omega-3 + Protein Unsweetened or Organic tri-bean blend dark red kidney beans, pinto beans & black beans, tri-bean blend?

It depends on your goals. Flaxmilk Omega-3 + Protein Unsweetened has 20.8 calories, while Organic tri-bean blend dark red kidney beans, pinto beans & black beans, tri-bean blend has 84.6 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Flaxmilk Omega-3 + Protein Unsweetened vegan?

No, Flaxmilk Omega-3 + Protein Unsweetened is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Flaxmilk Omega-3 + Protein Unsweetened and Organic tri-bean blend dark red kidney beans, pinto beans & black beans, tri-bean blend?

There is a difference of 64 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.