Head-to-Head Analysis

FLIP 7 SUPERFOOD MEAL REPLACEMENT vs Chocolate Covered Peanuts

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Package of FLIP 7 SUPERFOOD MEAL REPLACEMENT

FLIP 7 SUPERFOOD MEAL REPLACEMENT

Not Vegan
VS
Top Pick
Package of Chocolate Covered Peanuts

Chocolate Covered Peanuts

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
367 kcal
Energy
0 kcal
8.2g
Sugars
0g
12.2g
Fat
0g
40.8g
Protein
0g
0g
Salt
0g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing FLIP 7 SUPERFOOD MEAL REPLACEMENT and Chocolate Covered Peanuts side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

FLIP 7 SUPERFOOD MEAL REPLACEMENT is the more energy-dense option here, packing 367 more calories per 100g than Chocolate Covered Peanuts. If you are looking for sustained energy or fueling a workout, this higher caloric density might be an advantage.

However, watch out for the sugar content. FLIP 7 SUPERFOOD MEAL REPLACEMENT contains significantly more sugar (8.16g) compared to the milder Chocolate Covered Peanuts (0g). If you are monitoring your insulin levels or trying to cut down on sweets, Chocolate Covered Peanuts is undeniably the healthier pick.

Looking to build muscle? FLIP 7 SUPERFOOD MEAL REPLACEMENT offers a protein boost with 40.8g per 100g, outperforming Chocolate Covered Peanuts in this category.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: FLIP 7 SUPERFOOD MEAL REPLACEMENT or Chocolate Covered Peanuts?

It depends on your goals. FLIP 7 SUPERFOOD MEAL REPLACEMENT has 367 calories, while Chocolate Covered Peanuts has 0 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is FLIP 7 SUPERFOOD MEAL REPLACEMENT vegan?

No, FLIP 7 SUPERFOOD MEAL REPLACEMENT is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between FLIP 7 SUPERFOOD MEAL REPLACEMENT and Chocolate Covered Peanuts?

There is a difference of 367 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.