Head-to-Head Analysis

Franks vs Sliced Ham

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Top Pick
Package of Franks

Franks

Not Vegan
VS
Package of Sliced Ham

Sliced Ham

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
325 kcal
Energy
0 kcal
2.5g
Sugars
8.3g
27.5g
Fat
3g
10g
Protein
16.7g
2.9g
Salt
2.4g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Franks and Sliced Ham side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

Franks is the more energy-dense option here, packing 325 more calories per 100g than Sliced Ham. If you are looking for sustained energy or fueling a workout, this higher caloric density might be an advantage.

In terms of sugar control, Franks takes the lead with only 2.5g of sugar per 100g, whereas Sliced Ham contains 8.33g. Lower sugar content is often linked to better metabolic health.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Franks or Sliced Ham?

It depends on your goals. Franks has 325 calories, while Sliced Ham has 0 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Franks vegan?

No, Franks is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Franks and Sliced Ham?

There is a difference of 325 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.