Head-to-Head Analysis

Free Range Thin-Sliced Breast Fillets vs Biscoff

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Package of Free Range Thin-Sliced Breast Fillets

Free Range Thin-Sliced Breast Fillets

Not Vegan
VS
Top Pick
Package of Biscoff

Biscoff

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
116 kcal
Energy
0 kcal
0g
Sugars
0g
2.7g
Fat
0g
22.3g
Protein
0g
0.1g
Salt
0g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Free Range Thin-Sliced Breast Fillets and Biscoff side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

Free Range Thin-Sliced Breast Fillets is the more energy-dense option here, packing 116 more calories per 100g than Biscoff. If you are looking for sustained energy or fueling a workout, this higher caloric density might be an advantage.

Looking to build muscle? Free Range Thin-Sliced Breast Fillets offers a protein boost with 22.3g per 100g, outperforming Biscoff in this category.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Free Range Thin-Sliced Breast Fillets or Biscoff?

It depends on your goals. Free Range Thin-Sliced Breast Fillets has 116 calories, while Biscoff has 0 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Free Range Thin-Sliced Breast Fillets vegan?

No, Free Range Thin-Sliced Breast Fillets is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Free Range Thin-Sliced Breast Fillets and Biscoff?

There is a difference of 116 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.