Head-to-Head Analysis

Froot Loops vs Tomato Paste With Basil, Garlic And Oregano

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Package of Froot Loops

Froot Loops

Not Vegan
VS
Top Pick
Package of Tomato Paste With Basil, Garlic And Oregano

Tomato Paste With Basil, Garlic And Oregano

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
384.6 kcal
Energy
106 kcal
30.8g
Sugars
9.1g
3.8g
Fat
0g
5.1g
Protein
3g
1.3g
Salt
2.1g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Froot Loops and Tomato Paste With Basil, Garlic And Oregano side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

Froot Loops is the more energy-dense option here, packing 279 more calories per 100g than Tomato Paste With Basil, Garlic And Oregano. If you are looking for sustained energy or fueling a workout, this higher caloric density might be an advantage.

However, watch out for the sugar content. Froot Loops contains significantly more sugar (30.769230769231g) compared to the milder Tomato Paste With Basil, Garlic And Oregano (9.09g). If you are monitoring your insulin levels or trying to cut down on sweets, Tomato Paste With Basil, Garlic And Oregano is undeniably the healthier pick.

Looking to build muscle? Froot Loops offers a protein boost with 5.1282051282051g per 100g, outperforming Tomato Paste With Basil, Garlic And Oregano in this category.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Froot Loops or Tomato Paste With Basil, Garlic And Oregano?

It depends on your goals. Froot Loops has 384.61538461538 calories, while Tomato Paste With Basil, Garlic And Oregano has 106 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Froot Loops vegan?

No, Froot Loops is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Froot Loops and Tomato Paste With Basil, Garlic And Oregano?

There is a difference of 279 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.