Head-to-Head Analysis

Frosted Blue Sugar Cookies, Frosted vs Cocoa & Vanilla Gluten Free Bunny Grahams

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Package of Frosted Blue Sugar Cookies, Frosted

Frosted Blue Sugar Cookies, Frosted

Not Vegan
VS
Top Pick
Package of Cocoa & Vanilla Gluten Free Bunny Grahams

Cocoa & Vanilla Gluten Free Bunny Grahams

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
421 kcal
Energy
433 kcal
42.1g
Sugars
23.3g
15.8g
Fat
15g
2.6g
Protein
6.7g
0.8g
Salt
0.8g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Frosted Blue Sugar Cookies, Frosted and Cocoa & Vanilla Gluten Free Bunny Grahams side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

For calorie-conscious consumers, Frosted Blue Sugar Cookies, Frosted is the clear winner. With 12 fewer calories per 100g than its competitor, it allows for more volume while keeping your energy intake in check.

However, watch out for the sugar content. Frosted Blue Sugar Cookies, Frosted contains significantly more sugar (42.1g) compared to the milder Cocoa & Vanilla Gluten Free Bunny Grahams (23.3g). If you are monitoring your insulin levels or trying to cut down on sweets, Cocoa & Vanilla Gluten Free Bunny Grahams is undeniably the healthier pick.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Frosted Blue Sugar Cookies, Frosted or Cocoa & Vanilla Gluten Free Bunny Grahams?

It depends on your goals. Frosted Blue Sugar Cookies, Frosted has 421 calories, while Cocoa & Vanilla Gluten Free Bunny Grahams has 433 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Frosted Blue Sugar Cookies, Frosted vegan?

No, Frosted Blue Sugar Cookies, Frosted is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Frosted Blue Sugar Cookies, Frosted and Cocoa & Vanilla Gluten Free Bunny Grahams?

There is a difference of 12 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.