Head-to-Head Analysis

Fruit & Nut Granola vs Kellogg'S Apple Jacks Cereal Reduced Sugar 1Oz

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Top Pick
Package of Fruit & Nut Granola

Fruit & Nut Granola

Not Vegan
VS
Package of Kellogg'S Apple Jacks Cereal Reduced Sugar 1Oz

Kellogg'S Apple Jacks Cereal Reduced Sugar 1Oz

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
450 kcal
Energy
357 kcal
21.7g
Sugars
28.6g
20g
Fat
3.6g
10g
Protein
7.1g
0g
Salt
1.4g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Fruit & Nut Granola and Kellogg'S Apple Jacks Cereal Reduced Sugar 1Oz side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

Fruit & Nut Granola is the more energy-dense option here, packing 93 more calories per 100g than Kellogg'S Apple Jacks Cereal Reduced Sugar 1Oz. If you are looking for sustained energy or fueling a workout, this higher caloric density might be an advantage.

In terms of sugar control, Fruit & Nut Granola takes the lead with only 21.666666666667g of sugar per 100g, whereas Kellogg'S Apple Jacks Cereal Reduced Sugar 1Oz contains 28.6g. Lower sugar content is often linked to better metabolic health.

Looking to build muscle? Fruit & Nut Granola offers a protein boost with 10g per 100g, outperforming Kellogg'S Apple Jacks Cereal Reduced Sugar 1Oz in this category.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Fruit & Nut Granola or Kellogg'S Apple Jacks Cereal Reduced Sugar 1Oz?

It depends on your goals. Fruit & Nut Granola has 450 calories, while Kellogg'S Apple Jacks Cereal Reduced Sugar 1Oz has 357 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Fruit & Nut Granola vegan?

No, Fruit & Nut Granola is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Fruit & Nut Granola and Kellogg'S Apple Jacks Cereal Reduced Sugar 1Oz?

There is a difference of 93 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.