Head-to-Head Analysis

FRUIT PUNCH vs Picon california sweet roll

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Top Pick
Package of FRUIT PUNCH

FRUIT PUNCH

Not Vegan
VS
Package of Picon california sweet roll

Picon california sweet roll

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
500 kcal
Energy
352 kcal
0g
Sugars
16.9g
0g
Fat
14.1g
0g
Protein
7g
5g
Salt
0.6g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing FRUIT PUNCH and Picon california sweet roll side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

FRUIT PUNCH is the more energy-dense option here, packing 148 more calories per 100g than Picon california sweet roll. If you are looking for sustained energy or fueling a workout, this higher caloric density might be an advantage.

In terms of sugar control, FRUIT PUNCH takes the lead with only 0g of sugar per 100g, whereas Picon california sweet roll contains 16.9g. Lower sugar content is often linked to better metabolic health.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: FRUIT PUNCH or Picon california sweet roll?

It depends on your goals. FRUIT PUNCH has 500 calories, while Picon california sweet roll has 352 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is FRUIT PUNCH vegan?

No, FRUIT PUNCH is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between FRUIT PUNCH and Picon california sweet roll?

There is a difference of 148 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.