Head-to-Head Analysis

Fud, turkey ham cured turkey thigh meat with 30% water added vs Ground beef

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Package of Fud, turkey ham cured turkey thigh meat with 30% water added

Fud, turkey ham cured turkey thigh meat with 30% water added

Not Vegan
VS
Top Pick
Package of Ground beef

Ground beef

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
125 kcal
Energy
259 kcal
3.1g
Sugars
0g
4.7g
Fat
20.5g
15.6g
Protein
17g
2.7g
Salt
0.2g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Fud, turkey ham cured turkey thigh meat with 30% water added and Ground beef side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

For calorie-conscious consumers, Fud, turkey ham cured turkey thigh meat with 30% water added is the clear winner. With 134 fewer calories per 100g than its competitor, it allows for more volume while keeping your energy intake in check.

However, watch out for the sugar content. Fud, turkey ham cured turkey thigh meat with 30% water added contains significantly more sugar (3.12g) compared to the milder Ground beef (0g). If you are monitoring your insulin levels or trying to cut down on sweets, Ground beef is undeniably the healthier pick.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Fud, turkey ham cured turkey thigh meat with 30% water added or Ground beef?

It depends on your goals. Fud, turkey ham cured turkey thigh meat with 30% water added has 125 calories, while Ground beef has 259 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Fud, turkey ham cured turkey thigh meat with 30% water added vegan?

No, Fud, turkey ham cured turkey thigh meat with 30% water added is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Fud, turkey ham cured turkey thigh meat with 30% water added and Ground beef?

There is a difference of 134 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.