Fully Cooked Thick Cut Bacon vs Ultra Thin Sliced Black Forest Ham
Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.
Fully Cooked Thick Cut Bacon
Ultra Thin Sliced Black Forest Ham
The Verdict: Which is Better?
When placing Fully Cooked Thick Cut Bacon and Ultra Thin Sliced Black Forest Ham side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.
Fully Cooked Thick Cut Bacon is the more energy-dense option here, packing 393 more calories per 100g than Ultra Thin Sliced Black Forest Ham. If you are looking for sustained energy or fueling a workout, this higher caloric density might be an advantage.
In terms of sugar control, Fully Cooked Thick Cut Bacon takes the lead with only 0g of sugar per 100g, whereas Ultra Thin Sliced Black Forest Ham contains 1.79g. Lower sugar content is often linked to better metabolic health.
Looking to build muscle? Fully Cooked Thick Cut Bacon offers a protein boost with 33.3g per 100g, outperforming Ultra Thin Sliced Black Forest Ham in this category.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is healthier: Fully Cooked Thick Cut Bacon or Ultra Thin Sliced Black Forest Ham?
It depends on your goals. Fully Cooked Thick Cut Bacon has 500 calories, while Ultra Thin Sliced Black Forest Ham has 107 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.
Is Fully Cooked Thick Cut Bacon vegan?
No, Fully Cooked Thick Cut Bacon is not certified vegan.
What is the calorie difference between Fully Cooked Thick Cut Bacon and Ultra Thin Sliced Black Forest Ham?
There is a difference of 393 calories per 100g between the two products.
