Head-to-Head Analysis

Gelfilte fish sweet no msg vs Tuna Salad & Crackers Ranch

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Package of Gelfilte fish sweet no msg

Gelfilte fish sweet no msg

Not Vegan
VS
Top Pick
Package of Tuna Salad & Crackers Ranch

Tuna Salad & Crackers Ranch

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
117.6 kcal
Energy
378 kcal
5.9g
Sugars
4.9g
5.9g
Fat
26.2g
5.9g
Protein
9.8g
1.2g
Salt
1.2g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Gelfilte fish sweet no msg and Tuna Salad & Crackers Ranch side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

For calorie-conscious consumers, Gelfilte fish sweet no msg is the clear winner. With 260 fewer calories per 100g than its competitor, it allows for more volume while keeping your energy intake in check.

However, watch out for the sugar content. Gelfilte fish sweet no msg contains significantly more sugar (5.8823529411765g) compared to the milder Tuna Salad & Crackers Ranch (4.88g). If you are monitoring your insulin levels or trying to cut down on sweets, Tuna Salad & Crackers Ranch is undeniably the healthier pick.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Gelfilte fish sweet no msg or Tuna Salad & Crackers Ranch?

It depends on your goals. Gelfilte fish sweet no msg has 117.64705882353 calories, while Tuna Salad & Crackers Ranch has 378 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Gelfilte fish sweet no msg vegan?

No, Gelfilte fish sweet no msg is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Gelfilte fish sweet no msg and Tuna Salad & Crackers Ranch?

There is a difference of 260 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.