Head-to-Head Analysis

Gluten Free Animal Crackers vs Mandarin Oranges Snacks Bowls

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Package of Gluten Free Animal Crackers

Gluten Free Animal Crackers

Not Vegan
VS
Top Pick
Package of Mandarin Oranges Snacks Bowls

Mandarin Oranges Snacks Bowls

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
433 kcal
Energy
37.7 kcal
33.3g
Sugars
5.2g
11.7g
Fat
0g
6.7g
Protein
0.9g
0.6g
Salt
0g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Gluten Free Animal Crackers and Mandarin Oranges Snacks Bowls side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

Gluten Free Animal Crackers is the more energy-dense option here, packing 395 more calories per 100g than Mandarin Oranges Snacks Bowls. If you are looking for sustained energy or fueling a workout, this higher caloric density might be an advantage.

However, watch out for the sugar content. Gluten Free Animal Crackers contains significantly more sugar (33.3g) compared to the milder Mandarin Oranges Snacks Bowls (5.15g). If you are monitoring your insulin levels or trying to cut down on sweets, Mandarin Oranges Snacks Bowls is undeniably the healthier pick.

Looking to build muscle? Gluten Free Animal Crackers offers a protein boost with 6.67g per 100g, outperforming Mandarin Oranges Snacks Bowls in this category.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Gluten Free Animal Crackers or Mandarin Oranges Snacks Bowls?

It depends on your goals. Gluten Free Animal Crackers has 433 calories, while Mandarin Oranges Snacks Bowls has 37.7 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Gluten Free Animal Crackers vegan?

No, Gluten Free Animal Crackers is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Gluten Free Animal Crackers and Mandarin Oranges Snacks Bowls?

There is a difference of 395 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.