Head-to-Head Analysis

Gluten Free Double Chocolate Cookie Dough vs Psyllium Husk

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Package of Gluten Free Double Chocolate Cookie Dough

Gluten Free Double Chocolate Cookie Dough

Not Vegan
VS
Top Pick
Package of Psyllium Husk

Psyllium Husk

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
393.9 kcal
Energy
357 kcal
36.4g
Sugars
0g
21.2g
Fat
0g
3g
Protein
0g
0.5g
Salt
0g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Gluten Free Double Chocolate Cookie Dough and Psyllium Husk side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

Gluten Free Double Chocolate Cookie Dough is the more energy-dense option here, packing 37 more calories per 100g than Psyllium Husk. If you are looking for sustained energy or fueling a workout, this higher caloric density might be an advantage.

However, watch out for the sugar content. Gluten Free Double Chocolate Cookie Dough contains significantly more sugar (36.363636363636g) compared to the milder Psyllium Husk (0g). If you are monitoring your insulin levels or trying to cut down on sweets, Psyllium Husk is undeniably the healthier pick.

Looking to build muscle? Gluten Free Double Chocolate Cookie Dough offers a protein boost with 3.030303030303g per 100g, outperforming Psyllium Husk in this category.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Gluten Free Double Chocolate Cookie Dough or Psyllium Husk?

It depends on your goals. Gluten Free Double Chocolate Cookie Dough has 393.93939393939 calories, while Psyllium Husk has 357 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Gluten Free Double Chocolate Cookie Dough vegan?

No, Gluten Free Double Chocolate Cookie Dough is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Gluten Free Double Chocolate Cookie Dough and Psyllium Husk?

There is a difference of 37 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.