Gluten Free Graham Style Cookies Coated In Dark Chocolate vs Organic Soft Dried Smyrna Figs
Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Gluten Free Graham Style Cookies Coated In Dark Chocolate

Organic Soft Dried Smyrna Figs
The Verdict: Which is Better?
When placing Gluten Free Graham Style Cookies Coated In Dark Chocolate and Organic Soft Dried Smyrna Figs side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.
Gluten Free Graham Style Cookies Coated In Dark Chocolate is the more energy-dense option here, packing 311 more calories per 100g than Organic Soft Dried Smyrna Figs. If you are looking for sustained energy or fueling a workout, this higher caloric density might be an advantage.
In terms of sugar control, Gluten Free Graham Style Cookies Coated In Dark Chocolate takes the lead with only 28.95g of sugar per 100g, whereas Organic Soft Dried Smyrna Figs contains 47.5g. Lower sugar content is often linked to better metabolic health.
Looking to build muscle? Gluten Free Graham Style Cookies Coated In Dark Chocolate offers a protein boost with 7.89g per 100g, outperforming Organic Soft Dried Smyrna Figs in this category.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is healthier: Gluten Free Graham Style Cookies Coated In Dark Chocolate or Organic Soft Dried Smyrna Figs?
It depends on your goals. Gluten Free Graham Style Cookies Coated In Dark Chocolate has 526.32 calories, while Organic Soft Dried Smyrna Figs has 215 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.
Is Gluten Free Graham Style Cookies Coated In Dark Chocolate vegan?
No, Gluten Free Graham Style Cookies Coated In Dark Chocolate is not certified vegan.
What is the calorie difference between Gluten Free Graham Style Cookies Coated In Dark Chocolate and Organic Soft Dried Smyrna Figs?
There is a difference of 311 calories per 100g between the two products.




