Gluten Free Graham Style Cookies Coated In Dark Chocolate vs Salt & Vinegar Flavored Kettle Potato Chips
Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Gluten Free Graham Style Cookies Coated In Dark Chocolate

Salt & Vinegar Flavored Kettle Potato Chips
The Verdict: Which is Better?
When placing Gluten Free Graham Style Cookies Coated In Dark Chocolate and Salt & Vinegar Flavored Kettle Potato Chips side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.
Gluten Free Graham Style Cookies Coated In Dark Chocolate is the more energy-dense option here, packing 62 more calories per 100g than Salt & Vinegar Flavored Kettle Potato Chips. If you are looking for sustained energy or fueling a workout, this higher caloric density might be an advantage.
However, watch out for the sugar content. Gluten Free Graham Style Cookies Coated In Dark Chocolate contains significantly more sugar (28.95g) compared to the milder Salt & Vinegar Flavored Kettle Potato Chips (0g). If you are monitoring your insulin levels or trying to cut down on sweets, Salt & Vinegar Flavored Kettle Potato Chips is undeniably the healthier pick.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is healthier: Gluten Free Graham Style Cookies Coated In Dark Chocolate or Salt & Vinegar Flavored Kettle Potato Chips?
It depends on your goals. Gluten Free Graham Style Cookies Coated In Dark Chocolate has 526.32 calories, while Salt & Vinegar Flavored Kettle Potato Chips has 464.29 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.
Is Gluten Free Graham Style Cookies Coated In Dark Chocolate vegan?
No, Gluten Free Graham Style Cookies Coated In Dark Chocolate is not certified vegan.
What is the calorie difference between Gluten Free Graham Style Cookies Coated In Dark Chocolate and Salt & Vinegar Flavored Kettle Potato Chips?
There is a difference of 62 calories per 100g between the two products.




