Head-to-Head Analysis

Golden Crispy Panko Fish Fillets vs Atlantic Salmon Portion

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Package of Golden Crispy Panko Fish Fillets

Golden Crispy Panko Fish Fillets

Not Vegan
VS
Top Pick
Package of Atlantic Salmon Portion

Atlantic Salmon Portion

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
203.7 kcal
Energy
0 kcal
2.8g
Sugars
0g
8.3g
Fat
0g
9.3g
Protein
0g
1.2g
Salt
0g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Golden Crispy Panko Fish Fillets and Atlantic Salmon Portion side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

Golden Crispy Panko Fish Fillets is the more energy-dense option here, packing 204 more calories per 100g than Atlantic Salmon Portion. If you are looking for sustained energy or fueling a workout, this higher caloric density might be an advantage.

However, watch out for the sugar content. Golden Crispy Panko Fish Fillets contains significantly more sugar (2.7777777g) compared to the milder Atlantic Salmon Portion (0g). If you are monitoring your insulin levels or trying to cut down on sweets, Atlantic Salmon Portion is undeniably the healthier pick.

Looking to build muscle? Golden Crispy Panko Fish Fillets offers a protein boost with 9.259259g per 100g, outperforming Atlantic Salmon Portion in this category.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Golden Crispy Panko Fish Fillets or Atlantic Salmon Portion?

It depends on your goals. Golden Crispy Panko Fish Fillets has 203.7037 calories, while Atlantic Salmon Portion has 0 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Golden Crispy Panko Fish Fillets vegan?

No, Golden Crispy Panko Fish Fillets is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Golden Crispy Panko Fish Fillets and Atlantic Salmon Portion?

There is a difference of 204 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.