Head-to-Head Analysis

Golden Double Stuff Oreo vs Organic plantain chips himalayan pink salt ounce salty

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Package of Golden Double Stuff Oreo

Golden Double Stuff Oreo

Not Vegan
VS
Top Pick
Package of Organic plantain chips himalayan pink salt ounce salty

Organic plantain chips himalayan pink salt ounce salty

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
517 kcal
Energy
535.7 kcal
41.4g
Sugars
0g
24.1g
Fat
32.1g
1.7g
Protein
0g
0.7g
Salt
0.5g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Golden Double Stuff Oreo and Organic plantain chips himalayan pink salt ounce salty side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

For calorie-conscious consumers, Golden Double Stuff Oreo is the clear winner. With 19 fewer calories per 100g than its competitor, it allows for more volume while keeping your energy intake in check.

However, watch out for the sugar content. Golden Double Stuff Oreo contains significantly more sugar (41.4g) compared to the milder Organic plantain chips himalayan pink salt ounce salty (0g). If you are monitoring your insulin levels or trying to cut down on sweets, Organic plantain chips himalayan pink salt ounce salty is undeniably the healthier pick.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Golden Double Stuff Oreo or Organic plantain chips himalayan pink salt ounce salty?

It depends on your goals. Golden Double Stuff Oreo has 517 calories, while Organic plantain chips himalayan pink salt ounce salty has 535.71428571429 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Golden Double Stuff Oreo vegan?

No, Golden Double Stuff Oreo is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Golden Double Stuff Oreo and Organic plantain chips himalayan pink salt ounce salty?

There is a difference of 19 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.