Head-to-Head Analysis

Gourmet style sardine fillets in mustard & dill sauce, mustard & dill sauce vs Pink Salmon Skin-On Fillets

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Package of Gourmet style sardine fillets in mustard & dill sauce, mustard & dill sauce

Gourmet style sardine fillets in mustard & dill sauce, mustard & dill sauce

Not Vegan
VS
Top Pick
Package of Pink Salmon Skin-On Fillets

Pink Salmon Skin-On Fillets

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
160 kcal
Energy
116 kcal
0.9g
Sugars
0g
9.4g
Fat
4g
16g
Protein
19.6g
1.4g
Salt
0.4g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Gourmet style sardine fillets in mustard & dill sauce, mustard & dill sauce and Pink Salmon Skin-On Fillets side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

Gourmet style sardine fillets in mustard & dill sauce, mustard & dill sauce is the more energy-dense option here, packing 44 more calories per 100g than Pink Salmon Skin-On Fillets. If you are looking for sustained energy or fueling a workout, this higher caloric density might be an advantage.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Gourmet style sardine fillets in mustard & dill sauce, mustard & dill sauce or Pink Salmon Skin-On Fillets?

It depends on your goals. Gourmet style sardine fillets in mustard & dill sauce, mustard & dill sauce has 160 calories, while Pink Salmon Skin-On Fillets has 116 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Gourmet style sardine fillets in mustard & dill sauce, mustard & dill sauce vegan?

No, Gourmet style sardine fillets in mustard & dill sauce, mustard & dill sauce is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Gourmet style sardine fillets in mustard & dill sauce, mustard & dill sauce and Pink Salmon Skin-On Fillets?

There is a difference of 44 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.