Head-to-Head Analysis

Grahams vs Dark chocolate with chocolate filling

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Package of Grahams

Grahams

Not Vegan
VS
Top Pick
Package of Dark chocolate with chocolate filling

Dark chocolate with chocolate filling

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
419.4 kcal
Energy
511 kcal
25.8g
Sugars
14.9g
9.7g
Fat
29.8g
6.5g
Protein
4.3g
1.4g
Salt
0.1g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Grahams and Dark chocolate with chocolate filling side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

For calorie-conscious consumers, Grahams is the clear winner. With 92 fewer calories per 100g than its competitor, it allows for more volume while keeping your energy intake in check.

However, watch out for the sugar content. Grahams contains significantly more sugar (25.81g) compared to the milder Dark chocolate with chocolate filling (14.9g). If you are monitoring your insulin levels or trying to cut down on sweets, Dark chocolate with chocolate filling is undeniably the healthier pick.

Looking to build muscle? Grahams offers a protein boost with 6.45g per 100g, outperforming Dark chocolate with chocolate filling in this category.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Grahams or Dark chocolate with chocolate filling?

It depends on your goals. Grahams has 419.35 calories, while Dark chocolate with chocolate filling has 511 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Grahams vegan?

No, Grahams is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Grahams and Dark chocolate with chocolate filling?

There is a difference of 92 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.