Head-to-Head Analysis

Grandma utz's handcooked potato chips vs Bubble milk tea classic

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Top Pick
Package of Grandma utz's handcooked potato chips

Grandma utz's handcooked potato chips

Not Vegan
VS
Package of Bubble milk tea classic

Bubble milk tea classic

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
535.7 kcal
Energy
40.9 kcal
0g
Sugars
7.7g
32.1g
Fat
0.9g
7.1g
Protein
0.6g
1.1g
Salt
0g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Grandma utz's handcooked potato chips and Bubble milk tea classic side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

Grandma utz's handcooked potato chips is the more energy-dense option here, packing 495 more calories per 100g than Bubble milk tea classic. If you are looking for sustained energy or fueling a workout, this higher caloric density might be an advantage.

In terms of sugar control, Grandma utz's handcooked potato chips takes the lead with only 0g of sugar per 100g, whereas Bubble milk tea classic contains 7.7142857142857g. Lower sugar content is often linked to better metabolic health.

Looking to build muscle? Grandma utz's handcooked potato chips offers a protein boost with 7.1429g per 100g, outperforming Bubble milk tea classic in this category.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Grandma utz's handcooked potato chips or Bubble milk tea classic?

It depends on your goals. Grandma utz's handcooked potato chips has 535.7143 calories, while Bubble milk tea classic has 40.857142857143 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Grandma utz's handcooked potato chips vegan?

No, Grandma utz's handcooked potato chips is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Grandma utz's handcooked potato chips and Bubble milk tea classic?

There is a difference of 495 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.