Head-to-Head Analysis

Granola Barely Sweet vs Wood Thrush Medium Roast Ground Coffee

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Package of Granola Barely Sweet

Granola Barely Sweet

Not Vegan
VS
Top Pick
Package of Wood Thrush Medium Roast Ground Coffee

Wood Thrush Medium Roast Ground Coffee

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
456 kcal
Energy
0 kcal
7g
Sugars
0g
24.6g
Fat
0g
15.8g
Protein
0g
0.6g
Salt
0g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Granola Barely Sweet and Wood Thrush Medium Roast Ground Coffee side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

Granola Barely Sweet is the more energy-dense option here, packing 456 more calories per 100g than Wood Thrush Medium Roast Ground Coffee. If you are looking for sustained energy or fueling a workout, this higher caloric density might be an advantage.

However, watch out for the sugar content. Granola Barely Sweet contains significantly more sugar (7.02g) compared to the milder Wood Thrush Medium Roast Ground Coffee (0g). If you are monitoring your insulin levels or trying to cut down on sweets, Wood Thrush Medium Roast Ground Coffee is undeniably the healthier pick.

Looking to build muscle? Granola Barely Sweet offers a protein boost with 15.8g per 100g, outperforming Wood Thrush Medium Roast Ground Coffee in this category.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Granola Barely Sweet or Wood Thrush Medium Roast Ground Coffee?

It depends on your goals. Granola Barely Sweet has 456 calories, while Wood Thrush Medium Roast Ground Coffee has 0 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Granola Barely Sweet vegan?

No, Granola Barely Sweet is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Granola Barely Sweet and Wood Thrush Medium Roast Ground Coffee?

There is a difference of 456 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.