Head-to-Head Analysis

Grass fed beef franks vs Black Forest Uncured Ham

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Top Pick
Package of Grass fed beef franks

Grass fed beef franks

Not Vegan
VS
Package of Black Forest Uncured Ham

Black Forest Uncured Ham

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
0 kcal
Energy
106 kcal
0g
Sugars
1.8g
0g
Fat
1.8g
0g
Protein
19.4g
0g
Salt
3.2g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Grass fed beef franks and Black Forest Uncured Ham side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

For calorie-conscious consumers, Grass fed beef franks is the clear winner. With 106 fewer calories per 100g than its competitor, it allows for more volume while keeping your energy intake in check.

In terms of sugar control, Grass fed beef franks takes the lead with only 0g of sugar per 100g, whereas Black Forest Uncured Ham contains 1.77g. Lower sugar content is often linked to better metabolic health.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Grass fed beef franks or Black Forest Uncured Ham?

Grass fed beef franks appears to be the healthier option generally, as it has less sugar and fewer calories.

Is Grass fed beef franks vegan?

No, Grass fed beef franks is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Grass fed beef franks and Black Forest Uncured Ham?

There is a difference of 106 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.