Head-to-Head Analysis

Grass-fed Ground Lamb vs Hamburger Slices

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Top Pick
Package of Grass-fed Ground Lamb

Grass-fed Ground Lamb

Not Vegan
VS
Package of Hamburger Slices

Hamburger Slices

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
214 kcal
Energy
17.9 kcal
0g
Sugars
3.6g
16.1g
Fat
0g
17.9g
Protein
0g
0.2g
Salt
2.9g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Grass-fed Ground Lamb and Hamburger Slices side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

Grass-fed Ground Lamb is the more energy-dense option here, packing 196 more calories per 100g than Hamburger Slices. If you are looking for sustained energy or fueling a workout, this higher caloric density might be an advantage.

In terms of sugar control, Grass-fed Ground Lamb takes the lead with only 0g of sugar per 100g, whereas Hamburger Slices contains 3.57g. Lower sugar content is often linked to better metabolic health.

Looking to build muscle? Grass-fed Ground Lamb offers a protein boost with 17.9g per 100g, outperforming Hamburger Slices in this category.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Grass-fed Ground Lamb or Hamburger Slices?

It depends on your goals. Grass-fed Ground Lamb has 214 calories, while Hamburger Slices has 17.86 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Grass-fed Ground Lamb vegan?

No, Grass-fed Ground Lamb is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Grass-fed Ground Lamb and Hamburger Slices?

There is a difference of 196 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.