Head-to-Head Analysis

GRASS-FED PROTEIN+ vs Baked crunchy chocolate coconut chips

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Top Pick
Package of GRASS-FED PROTEIN+

GRASS-FED PROTEIN+

Not Vegan
VS
Package of Baked crunchy chocolate coconut chips

Baked crunchy chocolate coconut chips

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
508 kcal
Energy
533 kcal
20g
Sugars
36.7g
28.3g
Fat
30g
26.7g
Protein
6.7g
1g
Salt
0.2g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing GRASS-FED PROTEIN+ and Baked crunchy chocolate coconut chips side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

For calorie-conscious consumers, GRASS-FED PROTEIN+ is the clear winner. With 25 fewer calories per 100g than its competitor, it allows for more volume while keeping your energy intake in check.

In terms of sugar control, GRASS-FED PROTEIN+ takes the lead with only 20g of sugar per 100g, whereas Baked crunchy chocolate coconut chips contains 36.669996666667g. Lower sugar content is often linked to better metabolic health.

Looking to build muscle? GRASS-FED PROTEIN+ offers a protein boost with 26.7g per 100g, outperforming Baked crunchy chocolate coconut chips in this category.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: GRASS-FED PROTEIN+ or Baked crunchy chocolate coconut chips?

GRASS-FED PROTEIN+ appears to be the healthier option generally, as it has less sugar and fewer calories.

Is GRASS-FED PROTEIN+ vegan?

No, GRASS-FED PROTEIN+ is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between GRASS-FED PROTEIN+ and Baked crunchy chocolate coconut chips?

There is a difference of 25 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.