Head-to-Head Analysis

Grass-fed Whey Isolate Dutch Chocolate vs Lightly Salted Matzos

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Package of Grass-fed Whey Isolate Dutch Chocolate

Grass-fed Whey Isolate Dutch Chocolate

Not Vegan
VS
Top Pick
Package of Lightly Salted Matzos

Lightly Salted Matzos

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
364 kcal
Energy
393 kcal
15.9g
Sugars
0g
3.4g
Fat
1.8g
70.5g
Protein
10.7g
0.7g
Salt
0.9g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Grass-fed Whey Isolate Dutch Chocolate and Lightly Salted Matzos side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

For calorie-conscious consumers, Grass-fed Whey Isolate Dutch Chocolate is the clear winner. With 29 fewer calories per 100g than its competitor, it allows for more volume while keeping your energy intake in check.

However, watch out for the sugar content. Grass-fed Whey Isolate Dutch Chocolate contains significantly more sugar (15.9g) compared to the milder Lightly Salted Matzos (0g). If you are monitoring your insulin levels or trying to cut down on sweets, Lightly Salted Matzos is undeniably the healthier pick.

Looking to build muscle? Grass-fed Whey Isolate Dutch Chocolate offers a protein boost with 70.5g per 100g, outperforming Lightly Salted Matzos in this category.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Grass-fed Whey Isolate Dutch Chocolate or Lightly Salted Matzos?

It depends on your goals. Grass-fed Whey Isolate Dutch Chocolate has 364 calories, while Lightly Salted Matzos has 393 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Grass-fed Whey Isolate Dutch Chocolate vegan?

No, Grass-fed Whey Isolate Dutch Chocolate is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Grass-fed Whey Isolate Dutch Chocolate and Lightly Salted Matzos?

There is a difference of 29 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.