Grassfed vs Reduced fat milk
Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.
Grassfed
Reduced fat milk
The Verdict: Which is Better?
When placing Grassfed and Reduced fat milk side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.
Grassfed is the more energy-dense option here, packing 371 more calories per 100g than Reduced fat milk. If you are looking for sustained energy or fueling a workout, this higher caloric density might be an advantage.
In terms of sugar control, Grassfed takes the lead with only 0g of sugar per 100g, whereas Reduced fat milk contains 5.42g. Lower sugar content is often linked to better metabolic health.
Looking to build muscle? Grassfed offers a protein boost with 28.6g per 100g, outperforming Reduced fat milk in this category.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is healthier: Grassfed or Reduced fat milk?
It depends on your goals. Grassfed has 429 calories, while Reduced fat milk has 58 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.
Is Grassfed vegan?
No, Grassfed is not certified vegan.
What is the calorie difference between Grassfed and Reduced fat milk?
There is a difference of 371 calories per 100g between the two products.
