Head-to-Head Analysis

Great Value Frozen Wild Caught Pacific Whiting Skin-On Fillets, 2 lb vs Breaded Fish Sticks

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Top Pick
Package of Great Value Frozen Wild Caught Pacific Whiting Skin-On Fillets, 2 lb

Great Value Frozen Wild Caught Pacific Whiting Skin-On Fillets, 2 lb

Not Vegan
VS
Package of Breaded Fish Sticks

Breaded Fish Sticks

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
100 kcal
Energy
193 kcal
0g
Sugars
0g
1.5g
Fat
7.9g
21g
Protein
11.4g
0.2g
Salt
0.5g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Great Value Frozen Wild Caught Pacific Whiting Skin-On Fillets, 2 lb and Breaded Fish Sticks side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

For calorie-conscious consumers, Great Value Frozen Wild Caught Pacific Whiting Skin-On Fillets, 2 lb is the clear winner. With 93 fewer calories per 100g than its competitor, it allows for more volume while keeping your energy intake in check.

Looking to build muscle? Great Value Frozen Wild Caught Pacific Whiting Skin-On Fillets, 2 lb offers a protein boost with 21g per 100g, outperforming Breaded Fish Sticks in this category.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Great Value Frozen Wild Caught Pacific Whiting Skin-On Fillets, 2 lb or Breaded Fish Sticks?

It depends on your goals. Great Value Frozen Wild Caught Pacific Whiting Skin-On Fillets, 2 lb has 100 calories, while Breaded Fish Sticks has 193 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Great Value Frozen Wild Caught Pacific Whiting Skin-On Fillets, 2 lb vegan?

No, Great Value Frozen Wild Caught Pacific Whiting Skin-On Fillets, 2 lb is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Great Value Frozen Wild Caught Pacific Whiting Skin-On Fillets, 2 lb and Breaded Fish Sticks?

There is a difference of 93 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.