Head-to-Head Analysis

Great value, tortilla chips, lightly salted vs Rice crispy treats

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Top Pick
Package of Great value, tortilla chips, lightly salted

Great value, tortilla chips, lightly salted

Not Vegan
VS
Package of Rice crispy treats

Rice crispy treats

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
500 kcal
Energy
428.6 kcal
0g
Sugars
39.3g
21.4g
Fat
14.3g
7.1g
Protein
3.6g
0.5g
Salt
0.4g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Great value, tortilla chips, lightly salted and Rice crispy treats side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

Great value, tortilla chips, lightly salted is the more energy-dense option here, packing 71 more calories per 100g than Rice crispy treats. If you are looking for sustained energy or fueling a workout, this higher caloric density might be an advantage.

In terms of sugar control, Great value, tortilla chips, lightly salted takes the lead with only 0g of sugar per 100g, whereas Rice crispy treats contains 39.2857g. Lower sugar content is often linked to better metabolic health.

Looking to build muscle? Great value, tortilla chips, lightly salted offers a protein boost with 7.14g per 100g, outperforming Rice crispy treats in this category.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Great value, tortilla chips, lightly salted or Rice crispy treats?

It depends on your goals. Great value, tortilla chips, lightly salted has 500 calories, while Rice crispy treats has 428.5714 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Great value, tortilla chips, lightly salted vegan?

No, Great value, tortilla chips, lightly salted is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Great value, tortilla chips, lightly salted and Rice crispy treats?

There is a difference of 71 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.