GREEN TEA CITRUS vs Almond Malk
Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.
GREEN TEA CITRUS
Almond Malk
The Verdict: Which is Better?
When placing GREEN TEA CITRUS and Almond Malk side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.
GREEN TEA CITRUS is the more energy-dense option here, packing 114 more calories per 100g than Almond Malk. If you are looking for sustained energy or fueling a workout, this higher caloric density might be an advantage.
However, watch out for the sugar content. GREEN TEA CITRUS contains significantly more sugar (33.333333333333g) compared to the milder Almond Malk (0g). If you are monitoring your insulin levels or trying to cut down on sweets, Almond Malk is undeniably the healthier pick.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is healthier: GREEN TEA CITRUS or Almond Malk?
It depends on your goals. GREEN TEA CITRUS has 138.88888888889 calories, while Almond Malk has 25 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.
Is GREEN TEA CITRUS vegan?
No, GREEN TEA CITRUS is not certified vegan.
What is the calorie difference between GREEN TEA CITRUS and Almond Malk?
There is a difference of 114 calories per 100g between the two products.
