Grilled Chicken Marsala vs Psyllium Husk
Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.
Grilled Chicken Marsala
Psyllium Husk
The Verdict: Which is Better?
When placing Grilled Chicken Marsala and Psyllium Husk side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.
For calorie-conscious consumers, Grilled Chicken Marsala is the clear winner. With 293 fewer calories per 100g than its competitor, it allows for more volume while keeping your energy intake in check.
However, watch out for the sugar content. Grilled Chicken Marsala contains significantly more sugar (1.43g) compared to the milder Psyllium Husk (0g). If you are monitoring your insulin levels or trying to cut down on sweets, Psyllium Husk is undeniably the healthier pick.
Looking to build muscle? Grilled Chicken Marsala offers a protein boost with 6.07g per 100g, outperforming Psyllium Husk in this category.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is healthier: Grilled Chicken Marsala or Psyllium Husk?
It depends on your goals. Grilled Chicken Marsala has 64.3 calories, while Psyllium Husk has 357 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.
Is Grilled Chicken Marsala vegan?
No, Grilled Chicken Marsala is not certified vegan.
What is the calorie difference between Grilled Chicken Marsala and Psyllium Husk?
There is a difference of 293 calories per 100g between the two products.
