Head-to-Head Analysis

GROUND BEEF 85% LEAN / 15% FAT vs Cranberry almond + antioxidants with macadamia nuts

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Top Pick
Package of GROUND BEEF 85% LEAN / 15% FAT

GROUND BEEF 85% LEAN / 15% FAT

Not Vegan
VS
Package of Cranberry almond + antioxidants with macadamia nuts

Cranberry almond + antioxidants with macadamia nuts

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
214 kcal
Energy
400 kcal
0g
Sugars
20g
15.2g
Fat
30g
18.8g
Protein
12.5g
0.2g
Salt
0.1g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing GROUND BEEF 85% LEAN / 15% FAT and Cranberry almond + antioxidants with macadamia nuts side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

For calorie-conscious consumers, GROUND BEEF 85% LEAN / 15% FAT is the clear winner. With 186 fewer calories per 100g than its competitor, it allows for more volume while keeping your energy intake in check.

In terms of sugar control, GROUND BEEF 85% LEAN / 15% FAT takes the lead with only 0g of sugar per 100g, whereas Cranberry almond + antioxidants with macadamia nuts contains 20g. Lower sugar content is often linked to better metabolic health.

Looking to build muscle? GROUND BEEF 85% LEAN / 15% FAT offers a protein boost with 18.8g per 100g, outperforming Cranberry almond + antioxidants with macadamia nuts in this category.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: GROUND BEEF 85% LEAN / 15% FAT or Cranberry almond + antioxidants with macadamia nuts?

GROUND BEEF 85% LEAN / 15% FAT appears to be the healthier option generally, as it has less sugar and fewer calories.

Is GROUND BEEF 85% LEAN / 15% FAT vegan?

No, GROUND BEEF 85% LEAN / 15% FAT is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between GROUND BEEF 85% LEAN / 15% FAT and Cranberry almond + antioxidants with macadamia nuts?

There is a difference of 186 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.