Head-to-Head Analysis

Half and Half vs Reduced fat milk

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Top Pick
Package of Half and Half

Half and Half

Not Vegan
VS
Package of Reduced fat milk

Reduced fat milk

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
133.3 kcal
Energy
59.3 kcal
3.3g
Sugars
5.7g
10g
Fat
2g
3.3g
Protein
4.2g
0.1g
Salt
0.2g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Half and Half and Reduced fat milk side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

Half and Half is the more energy-dense option here, packing 74 more calories per 100g than Reduced fat milk. If you are looking for sustained energy or fueling a workout, this higher caloric density might be an advantage.

In terms of sugar control, Half and Half takes the lead with only 3.3333333333333g of sugar per 100g, whereas Reduced fat milk contains 5.65g. Lower sugar content is often linked to better metabolic health.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Half and Half or Reduced fat milk?

It depends on your goals. Half and Half has 133.33333333333 calories, while Reduced fat milk has 59.3 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Half and Half vegan?

No, Half and Half is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Half and Half and Reduced fat milk?

There is a difference of 74 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.