Head-to-Head Analysis

Half & Half Ultra Pasteurized vs Organic 2% milkfat reduced fat milk

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Top Pick
Package of Half & Half Ultra Pasteurized

Half & Half Ultra Pasteurized

Not Vegan
VS
Package of Organic 2% milkfat reduced fat milk

Organic 2% milkfat reduced fat milk

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
133 kcal
Energy
58.3 kcal
3.3g
Sugars
5.4g
10g
Fat
2.1g
11.1g
Protein
4.2g
0.2g
Salt
0.1g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Half & Half Ultra Pasteurized and Organic 2% milkfat reduced fat milk side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

Half & Half Ultra Pasteurized is the more energy-dense option here, packing 75 more calories per 100g than Organic 2% milkfat reduced fat milk. If you are looking for sustained energy or fueling a workout, this higher caloric density might be an advantage.

In terms of sugar control, Half & Half Ultra Pasteurized takes the lead with only 3.33g of sugar per 100g, whereas Organic 2% milkfat reduced fat milk contains 5.42g. Lower sugar content is often linked to better metabolic health.

Looking to build muscle? Half & Half Ultra Pasteurized offers a protein boost with 11.1g per 100g, outperforming Organic 2% milkfat reduced fat milk in this category.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Half & Half Ultra Pasteurized or Organic 2% milkfat reduced fat milk?

It depends on your goals. Half & Half Ultra Pasteurized has 133 calories, while Organic 2% milkfat reduced fat milk has 58.3 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Half & Half Ultra Pasteurized vegan?

No, Half & Half Ultra Pasteurized is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Half & Half Ultra Pasteurized and Organic 2% milkfat reduced fat milk?

There is a difference of 75 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.