Head-to-Head Analysis

Ham vs Chicken Tenders

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Package of Ham

Ham

Not Vegan
VS
Top Pick
Package of Chicken Tenders

Chicken Tenders

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
107 kcal
Energy
221 kcal
3.6g
Sugars
1.1g
1.8g
Fat
10.5g
17.9g
Protein
13.7g
2.4g
Salt
1.3g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Ham and Chicken Tenders side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

For calorie-conscious consumers, Ham is the clear winner. With 114 fewer calories per 100g than its competitor, it allows for more volume while keeping your energy intake in check.

However, watch out for the sugar content. Ham contains significantly more sugar (3.57g) compared to the milder Chicken Tenders (1.05g). If you are monitoring your insulin levels or trying to cut down on sweets, Chicken Tenders is undeniably the healthier pick.

Looking to build muscle? Ham offers a protein boost with 17.9g per 100g, outperforming Chicken Tenders in this category.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Ham or Chicken Tenders?

It depends on your goals. Ham has 107 calories, while Chicken Tenders has 221 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Ham vegan?

No, Ham is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Ham and Chicken Tenders?

There is a difference of 114 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.