Head-to-Head Analysis

Ham vs Spicy sweet chili

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Top Pick
Package of Ham

Ham

Not Vegan
VS
Package of Spicy sweet chili

Spicy sweet chili

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
118 kcal
Energy
140 kcal
0g
Sugars
1g
3.5g
Fat
11g
18.8g
Protein
2g
0g
Salt
0g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Ham and Spicy sweet chili side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

For calorie-conscious consumers, Ham is the clear winner. With 22 fewer calories per 100g than its competitor, it allows for more volume while keeping your energy intake in check.

Looking to build muscle? Ham offers a protein boost with 18.8g per 100g, outperforming Spicy sweet chili in this category.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Ham or Spicy sweet chili?

Ham appears to be the healthier option generally, as it has less sugar and fewer calories.

Is Ham vegan?

No, Ham is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Ham and Spicy sweet chili?

There is a difference of 22 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.