Head-to-Head Analysis

Hamburger Helper Cheeseburger Macaroni vs Chicken dumplings

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Package of Hamburger Helper Cheeseburger Macaroni

Hamburger Helper Cheeseburger Macaroni

Not Vegan
VS
Top Pick
Package of Chicken dumplings

Chicken dumplings

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
353 kcal
Energy
79.2 kcal
6.3g
Sugars
0g
3.1g
Fat
2.1g
9.4g
Protein
5.8g
4.6g
Salt
1.1g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Hamburger Helper Cheeseburger Macaroni and Chicken dumplings side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

Hamburger Helper Cheeseburger Macaroni is the more energy-dense option here, packing 274 more calories per 100g than Chicken dumplings. If you are looking for sustained energy or fueling a workout, this higher caloric density might be an advantage.

However, watch out for the sugar content. Hamburger Helper Cheeseburger Macaroni contains significantly more sugar (6.25g) compared to the milder Chicken dumplings (0g). If you are monitoring your insulin levels or trying to cut down on sweets, Chicken dumplings is undeniably the healthier pick.

Looking to build muscle? Hamburger Helper Cheeseburger Macaroni offers a protein boost with 9.38g per 100g, outperforming Chicken dumplings in this category.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Hamburger Helper Cheeseburger Macaroni or Chicken dumplings?

It depends on your goals. Hamburger Helper Cheeseburger Macaroni has 353 calories, while Chicken dumplings has 79.166666666667 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Hamburger Helper Cheeseburger Macaroni vegan?

No, Hamburger Helper Cheeseburger Macaroni is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Hamburger Helper Cheeseburger Macaroni and Chicken dumplings?

There is a difference of 274 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.