Hatch Chile Beef Filet vs Candy tin pear cnnmn
Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.
Hatch Chile Beef Filet
Candy tin pear cnnmn
The Verdict: Which is Better?
When placing Hatch Chile Beef Filet and Candy tin pear cnnmn side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.
For calorie-conscious consumers, Hatch Chile Beef Filet is the clear winner. With 241 fewer calories per 100g than its competitor, it allows for more volume while keeping your energy intake in check.
In terms of sugar control, Hatch Chile Beef Filet takes the lead with only 1.41g of sugar per 100g, whereas Candy tin pear cnnmn contains 68.8g. Lower sugar content is often linked to better metabolic health.
Looking to build muscle? Hatch Chile Beef Filet offers a protein boost with 16.9g per 100g, outperforming Candy tin pear cnnmn in this category.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is healthier: Hatch Chile Beef Filet or Candy tin pear cnnmn?
Hatch Chile Beef Filet appears to be the healthier option generally, as it has less sugar and fewer calories.
Is Hatch Chile Beef Filet vegan?
No, Hatch Chile Beef Filet is not certified vegan.
What is the calorie difference between Hatch Chile Beef Filet and Candy tin pear cnnmn?
There is a difference of 241 calories per 100g between the two products.
