Head-to-Head Analysis

HAZELICIOUS Crunchy Bio Kakao Topping vs Lay's Potato Chips

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Package of HAZELICIOUS Crunchy Bio Kakao Topping

HAZELICIOUS Crunchy Bio Kakao Topping

Not Vegan
VS
Top Pick
Package of Lay's Potato Chips

Lay's Potato Chips

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
597 kcal
Energy
539 kcal
29.6g
Sugars
2.5g
44.2g
Fat
33.1g
13.7g
Protein
6.9g
0g
Salt
2.1g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing HAZELICIOUS Crunchy Bio Kakao Topping and Lay's Potato Chips side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

HAZELICIOUS Crunchy Bio Kakao Topping is the more energy-dense option here, packing 58 more calories per 100g than Lay's Potato Chips. If you are looking for sustained energy or fueling a workout, this higher caloric density might be an advantage.

However, watch out for the sugar content. HAZELICIOUS Crunchy Bio Kakao Topping contains significantly more sugar (29.6g) compared to the milder Lay's Potato Chips (2.5g). If you are monitoring your insulin levels or trying to cut down on sweets, Lay's Potato Chips is undeniably the healthier pick.

Looking to build muscle? HAZELICIOUS Crunchy Bio Kakao Topping offers a protein boost with 13.7g per 100g, outperforming Lay's Potato Chips in this category.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: HAZELICIOUS Crunchy Bio Kakao Topping or Lay's Potato Chips?

It depends on your goals. HAZELICIOUS Crunchy Bio Kakao Topping has 597 calories, while Lay's Potato Chips has 539 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is HAZELICIOUS Crunchy Bio Kakao Topping vegan?

No, HAZELICIOUS Crunchy Bio Kakao Topping is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between HAZELICIOUS Crunchy Bio Kakao Topping and Lay's Potato Chips?

There is a difference of 58 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.