Head-to-Head Analysis

Hearts of Romaine vs Coconutmilk

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Package of Hearts of Romaine

Hearts of Romaine

Not Vegan
VS
Top Pick
Package of Coconutmilk

Coconutmilk

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
23.5 kcal
Energy
96.2 kcal
1.2g
Sugars
0g
0g
Fat
9.6g
1.2g
Protein
0g
0g
Salt
0.3g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Hearts of Romaine and Coconutmilk side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

For calorie-conscious consumers, Hearts of Romaine is the clear winner. With 73 fewer calories per 100g than its competitor, it allows for more volume while keeping your energy intake in check.

However, watch out for the sugar content. Hearts of Romaine contains significantly more sugar (1.18g) compared to the milder Coconutmilk (0g). If you are monitoring your insulin levels or trying to cut down on sweets, Coconutmilk is undeniably the healthier pick.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Hearts of Romaine or Coconutmilk?

It depends on your goals. Hearts of Romaine has 23.5 calories, while Coconutmilk has 96.192 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Hearts of Romaine vegan?

No, Hearts of Romaine is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Hearts of Romaine and Coconutmilk?

There is a difference of 73 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.