Head-to-Head Analysis

Hi-chew vs Kraft handi-snacks oreo two compartment snacks sticks and cream 1x6.000 oz

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Package of Hi-chew

Hi-chew

Not Vegan
VS
Top Pick
Package of Kraft handi-snacks oreo two compartment snacks sticks and cream 1x6.000 oz

Kraft handi-snacks oreo two compartment snacks sticks and cream 1x6.000 oz

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
419.4 kcal
Energy
500 kcal
61.3g
Sugars
46.4g
9.7g
Fat
21.4g
0g
Protein
3.6g
0g
Salt
0.9g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Hi-chew and Kraft handi-snacks oreo two compartment snacks sticks and cream 1x6.000 oz side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

For calorie-conscious consumers, Hi-chew is the clear winner. With 81 fewer calories per 100g than its competitor, it allows for more volume while keeping your energy intake in check.

However, watch out for the sugar content. Hi-chew contains significantly more sugar (61.290322580645g) compared to the milder Kraft handi-snacks oreo two compartment snacks sticks and cream 1x6.000 oz (46.43g). If you are monitoring your insulin levels or trying to cut down on sweets, Kraft handi-snacks oreo two compartment snacks sticks and cream 1x6.000 oz is undeniably the healthier pick.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Hi-chew or Kraft handi-snacks oreo two compartment snacks sticks and cream 1x6.000 oz?

It depends on your goals. Hi-chew has 419.35483870968 calories, while Kraft handi-snacks oreo two compartment snacks sticks and cream 1x6.000 oz has 500 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Hi-chew vegan?

No, Hi-chew is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Hi-chew and Kraft handi-snacks oreo two compartment snacks sticks and cream 1x6.000 oz?

There is a difference of 81 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.