Himalayan pink salt quinoa chips vs Glico chocolate cream covered biscuit sticks
Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.
Himalayan pink salt quinoa chips
Glico chocolate cream covered biscuit sticks
The Verdict: Which is Better?
When placing Himalayan pink salt quinoa chips and Glico chocolate cream covered biscuit sticks side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.
Himalayan pink salt quinoa chips is the more energy-dense option here, packing 119 more calories per 100g than Glico chocolate cream covered biscuit sticks. If you are looking for sustained energy or fueling a workout, this higher caloric density might be an advantage.
In terms of sugar control, Himalayan pink salt quinoa chips takes the lead with only 0g of sugar per 100g, whereas Glico chocolate cream covered biscuit sticks contains 25g. Lower sugar content is often linked to better metabolic health.
Looking to build muscle? Himalayan pink salt quinoa chips offers a protein boost with 14.3g per 100g, outperforming Glico chocolate cream covered biscuit sticks in this category.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is healthier: Himalayan pink salt quinoa chips or Glico chocolate cream covered biscuit sticks?
It depends on your goals. Himalayan pink salt quinoa chips has 536 calories, while Glico chocolate cream covered biscuit sticks has 416.67 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.
Is Himalayan pink salt quinoa chips vegan?
No, Himalayan pink salt quinoa chips is not certified vegan.
What is the calorie difference between Himalayan pink salt quinoa chips and Glico chocolate cream covered biscuit sticks?
There is a difference of 119 calories per 100g between the two products.
