Head-to-Head Analysis

Hormel Chili No Beans vs Mozzarella Sliced Low Moisture Part-Skim Mozzarella Cheese

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Package of Hormel Chili No Beans

Hormel Chili No Beans

Not Vegan
VS
Top Pick
Package of Mozzarella Sliced Low Moisture Part-Skim Mozzarella Cheese

Mozzarella Sliced Low Moisture Part-Skim Mozzarella Cheese

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
110 kcal
Energy
286 kcal
1.7g
Sugars
0g
5.9g
Fat
19g
6.4g
Protein
23.8g
1.1g
Salt
1.7g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Hormel Chili No Beans and Mozzarella Sliced Low Moisture Part-Skim Mozzarella Cheese side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

For calorie-conscious consumers, Hormel Chili No Beans is the clear winner. With 176 fewer calories per 100g than its competitor, it allows for more volume while keeping your energy intake in check.

However, watch out for the sugar content. Hormel Chili No Beans contains significantly more sugar (1.69g) compared to the milder Mozzarella Sliced Low Moisture Part-Skim Mozzarella Cheese (0g). If you are monitoring your insulin levels or trying to cut down on sweets, Mozzarella Sliced Low Moisture Part-Skim Mozzarella Cheese is undeniably the healthier pick.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Hormel Chili No Beans or Mozzarella Sliced Low Moisture Part-Skim Mozzarella Cheese?

It depends on your goals. Hormel Chili No Beans has 110 calories, while Mozzarella Sliced Low Moisture Part-Skim Mozzarella Cheese has 286 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Hormel Chili No Beans vegan?

No, Hormel Chili No Beans is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Hormel Chili No Beans and Mozzarella Sliced Low Moisture Part-Skim Mozzarella Cheese?

There is a difference of 176 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.