Head-to-Head Analysis

Huel Essential, Chocolate Flavor vs Sapporo ichiban shio ramen japanese style noodles

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Top Pick
Package of Huel Essential, Chocolate Flavor

Huel Essential, Chocolate Flavor

Not Vegan
VS
Package of Sapporo ichiban shio ramen japanese style noodles

Sapporo ichiban shio ramen japanese style noodles

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
400 kcal
Energy
451 kcal
1g
Sugars
2.9g
9g
Fat
17.6g
20g
Protein
8.8g
0.6g
Salt
5.2g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Huel Essential, Chocolate Flavor and Sapporo ichiban shio ramen japanese style noodles side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

For calorie-conscious consumers, Huel Essential, Chocolate Flavor is the clear winner. With 51 fewer calories per 100g than its competitor, it allows for more volume while keeping your energy intake in check.

In terms of sugar control, Huel Essential, Chocolate Flavor takes the lead with only 1g of sugar per 100g, whereas Sapporo ichiban shio ramen japanese style noodles contains 2.9412g. Lower sugar content is often linked to better metabolic health.

Looking to build muscle? Huel Essential, Chocolate Flavor offers a protein boost with 20g per 100g, outperforming Sapporo ichiban shio ramen japanese style noodles in this category.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Huel Essential, Chocolate Flavor or Sapporo ichiban shio ramen japanese style noodles?

Huel Essential, Chocolate Flavor appears to be the healthier option generally, as it has less sugar and fewer calories.

Is Huel Essential, Chocolate Flavor vegan?

No, Huel Essential, Chocolate Flavor is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Huel Essential, Chocolate Flavor and Sapporo ichiban shio ramen japanese style noodles?

There is a difference of 51 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.