Head-to-Head Analysis

Iced Tea Tropical Fruit Flavor vs Chicken in a Biskit Original Baked Snack Crackers

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Package of Iced Tea Tropical Fruit Flavor

Iced Tea Tropical Fruit Flavor

Not Vegan
VS
Top Pick
Package of Chicken in a Biskit Original Baked Snack Crackers

Chicken in a Biskit Original Baked Snack Crackers

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
34.5 kcal
Energy
516 kcal
8.8g
Sugars
6.5g
0g
Fat
25.8g
0g
Protein
6.5g
0g
Salt
1.9g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Iced Tea Tropical Fruit Flavor and Chicken in a Biskit Original Baked Snack Crackers side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

For calorie-conscious consumers, Iced Tea Tropical Fruit Flavor is the clear winner. With 481 fewer calories per 100g than its competitor, it allows for more volume while keeping your energy intake in check.

However, watch out for the sugar content. Iced Tea Tropical Fruit Flavor contains significantly more sugar (8.79g) compared to the milder Chicken in a Biskit Original Baked Snack Crackers (6.45g). If you are monitoring your insulin levels or trying to cut down on sweets, Chicken in a Biskit Original Baked Snack Crackers is undeniably the healthier pick.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Iced Tea Tropical Fruit Flavor or Chicken in a Biskit Original Baked Snack Crackers?

It depends on your goals. Iced Tea Tropical Fruit Flavor has 34.5 calories, while Chicken in a Biskit Original Baked Snack Crackers has 516 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Iced Tea Tropical Fruit Flavor vegan?

No, Iced Tea Tropical Fruit Flavor is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Iced Tea Tropical Fruit Flavor and Chicken in a Biskit Original Baked Snack Crackers?

There is a difference of 481 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.